Phase I approved · Innovative Solutions Canada

Q-RELAY

This memory-assisted quantum repeater for standard fibre networks is designed around a control layer that Quantolio owns: the real-time synchronization and adaptive control that coordinate its quantum memories and Bell-state measurements.

Q-RELAY · PHASE I
DESIGN ENVELOPE
TARGETS
Elementary link
20-50km
Total distance
40-100km
Minimum storage
≥500µs
Retrieved fidelity
>90%
Interference visibility
≥90%
Temporal modes
16-32

These values define the Phase I design envelope and targets. No Q-RELAY results have been measured yet.

01 Investment Highlights

Q-RELAY targets the integrated repeater controller, a role no commercial product fills yet.

Quantum networks need repeaters to reach long distances over standard fibre. Quantolio is developing the control platform for those repeaters with federal grant funding, and it keeps ownership of the resulting intellectual property.

01

No integrated commercial repeater controller exists yet

Laboratories have demonstrated the components, but no commercial product yet runs memories, measurements, scheduling and recovery as one repeater node.

02

Quantolio owns the control-layer IP

Quantolio buys detectors and plans to source memories and photon-pair sources through laboratory partners. It builds the control software and firmware and owns all foreground intellectual property (IP).

03

The platform is not tied to one memory material

A hardware-abstraction layer lets different memory materials share the same device and network interfaces.

04

One control layer serves two federal programmes

Q-RELAY uses the same field-programmable gate array (FPGA) control layer as SENTINELLE-Q, which Innovative Solutions Canada selected for federal testing in September 2026.

05

Phase I is approved for non-dilutive federal grant funding

Phase I is approved under Innovative Solutions Canada. If Quantolio is invited, Phase II would fund a physical two-link prototype over up to 24 months.

06

Every milestone has a measurable success criterion

Phase I has six milestones over 26 weeks. If Q-RELAY does not exceed direct transmission, it would still deliver a quantified threshold roadmap.

02 The Market Problem

Long-distance quantum networks need repeaters, because the rate of a direct fibre link falls with distance.

10110010101001110101001101010010101001101010100101010011
01001101010100101011100101010010100111010100101010010101

Fibre loss limits direct transmission

Standard fibre loses 0.2 to 0.3 dB per kilometre near 1550 nm. Without a repeater, the entanglement rate cannot exceed the repeaterless rate-loss bound.

11100010101111001010010101010011101010001110101
00101101001011100101001010111010010100101101001

Stored states must survive until the adjacent link succeeds

A repeater holds one half of each link in memory until the neighbouring link succeeds. Memory lifetime and efficiency are therefore among the dominant feasibility risks.

01010011100101010010110100101001010111000101011
00000000010101000000001111110000000010101000000

Entanglement swapping requires indistinguishable photons

Each Bell-state measurement depends on interference between two photons, so their frequency, timing and polarization must match. Q-RELAY targets a visibility of 90% or more.

03 The Solution

Quantolio’s contribution is the control platform designed to run the whole repeater node.

Q-RELAY is designed to connect two fibre links through a central repeater node. Quantolio builds the control and network software, and a hardware-abstraction layer keeps it independent of any single memory material.

Current status

A comparative engineering study selected the two-link architecture and its Phase I test envelope. No integrated laboratory result is claimed yet.

Layer 3 Quantolio IP

Network software

The network layer handles device interfaces, scheduling, swapping coordination, routing and telemetry, and it will track every stored mode by age, fidelity and expiry.

04 How It Works

The repeater protocol runs in five steps, from photon-pair generation to end-to-end entanglement.

The FPGA controller will run this sequence for every temporal mode. Phase I must run it over at least 1,000 consecutive hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) cycles without manual intervention.

Protocol Steps
Generate
01 / 05
Schematic of the Q-RELAY sequence: two end nodes, two midpoint Bell-state measurement stations and a central repeater NODE A MIDPOINT BSM REPEATER MIDPOINT BSM NODE B
Telecom photon Memory photon (606 nm) Herald signal Entanglement

The schematic is not to scale in distance or time.

What happens

In the reference configuration, each source produces a photon pair by cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN): a 606 nm photon for the memory and a native telecom-band partner for the fibre.

SourcePPLN, cavity-enhanced
Wavelengths606 nm and telecom band

05 Temporal Multiplexing

Multiplexing gives each link attempt 16 to 32 chances to succeed.

Fibre loss means a single photon pair rarely succeeds over a long link. Q-RELAY sends photon pairs in 16 to 32 time bins per attempt, stores each in its own memory mode and keeps whichever one is heralded, so the success rate per attempt rises with the number of modes.

Attempts compared
Heralded mode No herald
1 temporal mode
Recent attempts
16 temporal modes
Recent attempts
32 temporal modes
Recent attempts
Probability of at least one herald per attempt
P = 1 − (1 − p)N

Here p is the success probability of one mode and N is the number of modes.

The animation uses an arbitrary success probability per mode and does not show Q-RELAY performance.

Phase I and Phase II
Where multiplexing appears in the programme
  • Phase IIThe Phase II prototype would characterize operation with 16 to 32 modes in physical memories.

06 First Differentiator

Fidelity-aware scheduling decides which stored states to use, keep or discard.

Today’s baseline is fixed first-in, first-out (FIFO) control. Q-RELAY will score every stored mode instead, and this scheduling logic will form part of Quantolio’s foreground IP.

Mode tracking
Heralded Ageing Retrieved Discarded
Bank L · left link
Bank R · right link

The animation shows how the controller tracks modes and does not represent measured data.

Q-RELAY Fidelity-aware

Each stored mode is scored before it is used

Scoring criteria
  • Age
  • Estimated fidelity
  • Retrieval probability
  • Adjacent-link readiness
  • Expected BSM success
Then the controller
Allocates memory Selects states Discards degraded modes Schedules swaps
Phase I must achieve at least one of the following improvements under identical assumptions
≥25%

higher fidelity-adjusted entanglement rate

≥25%

fewer memory modes at equal rate and fidelity

≥25%

lower discard rate

≥20%

higher delivered fidelity at a fixed rate

Improvements will be claimed only under identical test conditions, with both positive and negative operating regions reported.

07 Second Differentiator

Stabilization and fault recovery are designed into the node controller.

The controller will detect timing, detector, memory and link faults, suspend invalid attempts, recalibrate and restore operation without an operator. Today’s expert-operated setups cannot run unattended for hours.

  • Timing
  • Detector health
  • Memory state
  • Link loss
  • Frequency, phase and polarization
Phase I test
Eight-hour unattended run
HIL · injected faults
Run clock
00:00
/ 08:00 h
Monitor Detect Suspend Recalibrate Restore
0 h4 h8 h

The run will measure uptime, event loss, detection rate, false alarms, recovery time and manual interventions.

The animation illustrates the test procedure. Fault markers are illustrative and do not represent the test schedule.

These are Phase I acceptance thresholds. No Q-RELAY results have been measured yet.
≥90%

detection of supported injected faults

<5%

false alarms

≤10s

to initiate recovery

≤5min

to complete a supported recovery

≥80%

fewer manual interventions than the open-loop baseline

08 The Benchmark

Q-RELAY will be benchmarked against the repeaterless limit of direct transmission.

Phase I will compare Q-RELAY with the repeaterless rate-loss bound, known as the PLOB bound, which is the upper limit for any direct fibre link.

Repeaterless limit over standard fibre
0.2 dB/km 0.3 dB/km
The repeaterless rate-loss bound falls with distance for fibre loss of 0.2 and 0.3 dB per kilometre. The Phase I total distance of 40 to 100 km is shaded. PHASE I TOTAL DISTANCE RATE PER CHANNEL USE (LOG) DISTANCE (KM)

Q-RELAY must exceed this bound in at least one physically credible operating region. Its own curve is a Phase I output and is therefore not drawn.

A crossover region is found

Phase I will report where Q-RELAY exceeds direct transmission, with every input traced to a measurement, a published result or a component specification.

No crossover region is found

Phase I will deliver a quantified roadmap of the minimum memory, source, detector and multiplexing performance a repeater needs, and it will claim no unsupported advantage.

09 Phase I Programme

Phase I is a 26-week programme with six milestones, each tied to a measurable success criterion.

The milestones overlap, and the digital twin runs alongside the feasibility and controller work.

Total duration
26 weeks
Deliverable

Confirm the memory and source choices and freeze the architecture, baselines and acceptance tests.

Success criterion

Every outcome is mapped to a test, and one memory and one source and channel architecture are selected.

Deliverable

Build the digital twin and the repeaterless benchmark, with sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.

Success criterion

A validated model gives rate and fidelity against distance for direct transmission, fixed scheduling and adaptive Q-RELAY.

Deliverable

Model memory storage, efficiency and fidelity across 16 to 32 modes, complete the source and link-budget studies, and run optical measurements.

Success criterion

The preferred memory and channel interface are selected, and the minimum component thresholds for a crossover are documented.

Deliverable

Implement deterministic timing, the dual-memory state machines, 16 to 32 temporal modes, telemetry, adaptive scheduling and recovery on the FPGA.

Success criterion

The complete two-link sequence executes deterministically in hardware-in-the-loop tests.

Deliverable

Connect the digital twin, the FPGA and the emulators over representative fibre impairments, compare scheduling policies and run unattended tests with injected faults.

Success criterion

At least one scheduling improvement of 25% or more (or 20% or more in fidelity) is shown, and the eight-hour unattended run meets the fault-detection and recovery thresholds.

Deliverable

Compare performance with the repeaterless benchmark and complete the prototype, procurement, IP and commercialization plans.

Success criterion

Phase I ends with a credible crossover region or a quantified threshold roadmap, plus a complete Phase II prototype specification.

10 Phase II, If Invited

24
Months at most

Phase II would take Q-RELAY from feasibility to a physical two-link prototype.

The prototype would contain two fibre links and a central repeater node with physical rare-earth memories, photon-pair sources, detectors, FPGA controllers and network software.

Team

Phase II would need about 10 to 12 full-time-equivalent staff, with Quantolio performing at least half of the research and development.

Barriers and mitigation

The identified barriers include memory performance, cryogenic reliability, photon indistinguishability and long-lead components. Staged subsystem gates, alternate memory and wavelength options, early procurement and milestone-gated spending address them.

Next Steps

Discuss Q-RELAY with the team

Talk to the team about the investment case, quantum networks, distributed sensing, or laboratory collaboration on memories, sources and optical testing.

Investor briefing

Review the investment case, the IP position and the Phase I milestones with the team.

Research collaboration

Partner with the team on laboratory work involving memories, photon-pair sources and optical tests.

Phase II scoping

Discuss the scope of the two-link prototype, its subsystem gates and its procurement.

This form opens your email application. Send the draft to request a briefing.